The Great 8: Obama’s health principles, translated


Is eight (8) great?  No I’m not talking about octoplets or the octomom, I’m writing about Obama’s 8 principles for healthcare reform.  The great 8 are below, along with commentary by Politico.  — JEM, BEI

  1. Protect families’ financial health
  2. Make health coverage affordable
  3. Aim for universality
  4. Provide portability of coverage
  5. Guarantee choice
  6. Invest in prevention and wellness
  7. Improve patient safety and quality care
  8. Maintain long-term fiscal sustainability

 

[Politico] When it comes to health care reform, details are key, but it seems that President Barack Obama plans to avoid the minutiae and let eight vague principles speak for him. As written into the budget delivered to Congress last month, these delicately worded principles were crafted to appeal to the broadest possible audience, but behind each lies hints about Obama’s intentions — and the polarizing debates over taxes, mandates and government-run insurance plans on the horizon.  Here’s a translation of the principles, first detailed in his budget: 

1. Protect families’ financial health. The plan must reduce the growing premiums and other costs American citizens and businesses pay for health care. People must be protected from bankruptcy due to catastrophic illness. 

Translation: The health care debate isn’t just about the 47 million uninsured Americans. In fact, Obama more often cites the frequency with which medical bills force underinsured families into bankruptcy. So look for a host of policy prescriptions designed to make health care costs more predictable and affordable, including limiting what Americans pay for health insurance to no more than 10 percent of their annual income and providing subsidies to small businesses and individuals to pay for coverage.  

2. Make health coverage affordable. The plan must reduce high administrative costs, unnecessary tests and services, waste and other inefficiencies that consume money with no added health benefits. 

Translation: The insurance industry needs to shape up. Look to California, where Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger pushed legislation requiring insurers to spend at least 85 percent of their premium dollars on health care rather than spending them on overhead or converting them to profits. From a political standpoint, many lawmakers will want to crack down on the insurance industry, the most unpopular link in the health care debate. Industry insiders say they aren’t opposing a tough review, but the details matter, and they want other industries to be subject to similar treatment.   

3. Aim for universality. The plan must put the United States on a clear path to cover all Americans. 

Translation: Don’t expect universal health coverage all at once. Health insurance for all is the goal, but how to reach “universality” is the question that most threatens the negotiations. Driven by their distrust of insurance companies, labor unions and progressive Democrats want a government-sponsored plan to compete with private options. Fearful that government will drive them out of the market, the insurance industry is adamantly opposed. During the campaign, Obama pushed for a public plan option, but he has not indicated whether he is wedded to it. The insurance industry also favors individual mandates, such as a legal requirement that every American obtain insurance. Obama did not endorse such a mandate for adults, saying they would buy insurance on their own if costs were reduced. Libertarians say mandates will eventually mean a nationalized system.   

4. Provide portability of coverage. People should not be locked into their job just to secure health coverage, and no American should be denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions.

Translation: Obama wants a government-organized marketplace, known as an exchange, where Americans can compare and purchase plans of their choice. This is where the controversial question of a public option comes into play: Should a government insurance plan compete with private insurers? Obama and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) have both said yes. Insurers in the exchange would be prohibited from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. The industry says it can’t be expected to pick up the costs from expensive new customers if young — and cheaper-to-insure — customers aren’t directed into the system through a mandate. 

5. Guarantee choice. The plan should provide Americans a choice of health plans and physicians. They should have the option of keeping their employer-based health plan. 

Translation: Don’t get scared — Obama doesn’t want to pick your doctor. This is a deliberate message switch from 1993-94, when interest groups funded the famous “Harry and Louise” ads that cast the Clinton plan as an effort to remove choice from the equation. And no socialized medicine, either. As Baucus says, they are looking for a “uniquely American” solution, which means maintaining the employer-based health plan.

 

6. Invest in prevention and wellness. The plan must invest in public health measures proven to reduce cost drivers in our system — such as obesity, sedentary lifestyles and smoking — as well as guarantee access to proven preventive treatments. 

Translation: Get in shape — and get used to hearing a lot more about “individual responsibility.” Quit smoking. Exercise. Eat better. And, to encourage a healthier diet, perhaps a fast food tax? Well, maybe not. Americans value their personal choice and wallets too much. Look for Democrats and Republicans to talk a lot about preventing chronic diseases. 

7. Improve patient safety and quality care. The plan must ensure the implementation of proven patient safety measures and provide incentives for changes in the delivery system to reduce unnecessary variability in patient care. It must support the widespread use of health information technology and the development of data on the effectiveness of medical interventions to improve the quality of care delivered. 

Translation: The payment system is backward. Physicians receive money based on the amount of care they provide — the more tests and visits, the more they make. Obama and others want to shift to a quality-based payment system that rewards good care. And there’s also a movement to expand a concept known as medical home, which encourages practitioners to develop a comprehensive care management service to ensure that patients are filling their prescriptions, going to rehab and shopping for the right food. 

8. Maintain long-term fiscal sustainability. The plan must pay for itself by reducing the level of cost growth, improving productivity and dedicating additional sources of revenue. 

Translation: Read his lips: Taxes are needed, but they won’t do it all. The system needs a complete overhaul to create more efficiencies. Otherwise, costs will keep rising and more taxes will be needed — which is why Obama’s pushing principles 1 through 7.

 

 

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Miller & Berg’s interview by CNA on President Clinton’s ‘confused’ embryo remarks
Obama’s Stem Cell Decision Worries Some Scientists

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Health Insurance Policy For All Seasons

This plans help in the payment of our health care before time. It is advisable to know the type of coverage that your health insurance plan gives to you, the rules and guidelines that governs your health insurance plans in details. Many health insurance plans covers things like injuries, outpatient visits and pregnancies. This reason makes health insurance planning very important. The right insurer can only be contacted via a trusted health insurance website.

Hello!
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource!
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I’v just started to learn this language ;)
See you!
Your, Raiul Baztepo

Ah, we see the Obama administration is thinking of taxing fast-food restaurants (probably the only restaurants most of us can afford any more) and soda since they’re bad for us.

“Soda is clearly one of the most harmful products in the food supply, and it’s something government should discourage the consumption of,” says Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Public Interests.

Mr. Jacobsen, you are grossly mistaken, ignoring the drink that most Americans pay approximately $200/month for drinks that contains ammonia, arsenic, fecal coliform, E Coli, barium, chloride, mercury, nitrite, phenolics, silver, cyanide and perchlorate (rocket fuel) – our drinking water which your EPA refuses to acknowledge as detrimental to our health. But it’s big business that’s doing this to our water, and Mr. President doesn’t mess with big business – he is, after all, one of them. Rather than putting so much mental energy into healthcare reform, how about clean up the mess that is making us all sick? But if we got better, that would hurt the insurance and pharmaceutical companies (who invest billions in the tobacco industry), and we can’t have that now, can we?

Mr. Obama had the audacity to ask the American public if we’ve seen the price of arugula at Whole Foods lately.

1. Whole Foods is a racket with slim choosings of true Organic produce and meats. Nice of you to promote them, but who, Mr. Obama, can afford to shop at Whole Foods besides yourself (now)?

3. Mr. Obama, we shouldn’t HAVE to shop at Whole Foods for produce and meats that won’t kill us. Why don’t you tackle the likes of Monsanto and Con Agra who have poisoned our food supplies and tainted our meats with hormones and antibiotics (Oestradiol, Progesterone, Testosterone, rgBH, Zeranol, Trenbolone, Melengestrol, Synercid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, tetracycline, flouroquine, Cipro, Baytril, and estrogens) that cause obesity, immune disorders, resistance to antibiotics, premature puberty, pre-pubertal gynecomastia (Google it), autism, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, cognitive disorders, diabetes, hypothyroidism, uterine cancer, sudden infant death syndrome, brain disease, and poisoned our ground and waters they so zealously use in their pesticides that are absorbed into the fruits and vegetables we get at our neighborhood supermarket, instead of soda? How about tacklling the “Big Dogs” instead of staying on the porch playing Mama Obama hiding behind Hillary Clinton’s skirts and worrying about McDonalds and Soda?

Wanna tax something? Tax This:

1. Tax plastic surgery – you know, the tummy tucks, facelifts, breast implants, liposuction, microdermabrasion….all things the rich can afford and is a cash only market. No insurance involved. Lots of money to be made from that, especially from Hollywood. Let them start paying some taxes for a change since we’ve been paying their way and padding their wallets for centuries. You think Oprah would let you do this? Ask her, would you?

2. Tax prime cuts of beef. Yup, beef, if you’re so concerned about our health. Your filet mignons, your pricey beef that the middle class cannot afford – let it kill you and not us. You want to eat high on the hog? Tax ‘em. Why are you playing with soda and McDonalds when you can go for the gold?

3. How about taxing Manicures and Pedicures? You think this is a joke? The area where I live has approximately 14 nail salons in a 5-mile radius, and their shops are booming. You said you’re concerned about our health? Have you done your homework about the number of infections, diseases and nail fungii that these people get from these places? Tax ‘em, Mr. Obama. It is a luxury, and it is one booming business in the US. Why worry about soda when your young American women that voted you into office will without a blink pay another dollar or two at these filthy places – tax ‘em. Another all cash business and another luxury that you missed.

4. Instead of taking from the Medicare system and lowering the standards of service for the elderly who changed your diapers, fed you, clothed you, faught in numerous wars (that you did not) and worked their fingers to the bones from *nothing* without Government assistance – LEGALLY – to give you this “entitled” life and freedom you’re trying to take away from us, tax BABIES. Yup, babies. Think of how much money they will cost the healthcare system in a lifetime, unlike a Senior Citizen who may only have 10-20 more years left in them. The more babies, the more tax on them. No exclusions for the poor. Maybe if you start taxing babies they’ll start having less of them. Set a number – two, three – after which walks in the Baby Tax. Wanna have a bunch of kids? Great, but you pay MORE taxes, not less. You’ve got it all backwards, Mr. Obama. Tax credits should go to those who chose some restraint and live within their means, not to those looking for a security blanket in the Federal Government.

5. Tax people who stay up after midnight. That’s not good for you, either. Less than 8 hours sleep can cause hypertension, cognitive disorders, depression, mania, heart disease, poor work performance, slow reaction time and a wide array of other disorders. Mama Obama can have the electric companies monitor who runs their lights after midnight and they get taxed extra, unlike those of us who don’t drink soda or smoke or have 20 babies – we go to bed on time – why should we have to pay for the health costs and pick up the slack for those that don’t? Yup – tax electricity that is in excess after midnight – will bring down health insurance costs and teach you yunguns how to take care of yourself like Mom always told you. And help with Global Warming, too.

6. Double tax all-you-can-eat buffets. Enough said.

7. Tax the *wazoo* off big blue and white Boeing 747s that routinetly do publicity photo shoots and beer runs.

8. Tax parents whose kids who were never taught the concept and reason for “Time Outs” by the time they reach Kindergarden. Have Educational Testing Service develop a Functional Behavioral Assessment Test for students entering Kindergarten, and tax the Parents of the kids that fail.

9. Tax credits to parents who will give the above kids a swat on the rear.

10. Tax expectant Parents who have not participated in a “Nutrition 101″ course prior to giving birth.

11. Tax the Baby Food and formula manufacturers up the wazoo until they successfully complete a remedial “Carcinogen 101″ course (at their own expense).

11. Tax ALL school board members who refuse to mandate Physical Education, Nutrition and Home Economics courses.

11. Tax Congress, the President, the Governors, the Mayors, the EPA, USDA and the FDA for not having participated in a “Nutrition 101″, “Environmental Impact 101″ and a remedial “Fidelity” course prior to taking office (and I don’t mean the bank).

Lastly, tax those that don’t take their multivitamins daily. We do, so why should we have to pay the same taxes as those that don’t have time or sense to take care of themselves or eat right?

Remember that video that came out prior to the Primaries about Hillary Clinton standing in front of a stadium full of zombies vaguely resembling Communism? Well, that’s exactly what we’ve got on our hands now, my friends, except it’s her separated at birth twin.

And the majority voted for them. Would you like cheese with your whine?