Hurricane doctor suspended for 6 months-Dying patient received muscle-paralyzing drug


The state Board of Medicine has suspended a Hurricane doctor for six months after he gave a dying patient a muscle-paralyzing drug as part of “end of life” care.

Dr. Sean DiCristofaro will start serving his suspension Friday. DiCristofaro told the medical board he administered the drug after the patient was gasping for breath and his wife requested that everything be done to “keep him comfortable,” according to a consent order signed by the doctor.

Board of Medicine members concluded that DiCristofaro’s use of the drug on a dying patient was inappropriate and violated medical ethics, even though some doctors believe the drug may be appropriate for dying patients in “rare circumstances.”

DiCristofaro, who’s still practicing this week, referred questions Wednesday to his lawyer, Ted Martin, who declined comment.

Martin said the doctor wasn’t commenting out of respect for the patient’s family.

“It’s resolved,” Martin said. “At this point, it’s a closed matter.”

Last May, DiCristofaro told medical board investigators that, in hindsight, his use of the muscle-paralyzing drug Norcuron was an “error in judgment” and that he would not do it again, according to a medical board consent order.

The patient, who was in the intensive-care unit at CAMC Teays Valley Hospital, had advanced alcoholic liver disease. His wife and children had given “do not resuscitate” orders, according to medical board records.

The critically ill patient died on Jan. 4, 2007, about eight minutes after DiCristofaro administered the drug.

In response to the medical board’s complaint against him, DiCristofaro initially said his use of the neuromuscular-blocking drug on the dying patient “was appropriate palliative care under the unique circumstances of a patient suffering from agonal gasping whose death was clearly imminent.”

A doctor from East Carolina University School of Medicine submitted a report on DiCristofaro’s behalf, saying there’s an ethical basis for the use of muscle-paralyzing drugs on sedated patients in rare circumstances to allow them a “peaceful and comfortable” death.

But the Board of Medicine found that the drug’s use didn’t meet the “prevailing standard of medical and ethical care.”

DiCristofaro told board members he wasn’t trying to hasten the patient’s death by administering the drug, but wanted to ease the patient’s pain while he was gasping for breath. DiCristofaro, a family doctor who graduated from Marshall University’s School of Medicine and has been practicing since 1999, said the situation was “clinically difficult and emotionally painful and weighed heavily upon him.”

The Board of Medicine’s complaint committee launched an investigation against DiCristofaro after CAMC Teays Valley Chief Executive Officer Al Michaels sent a letter to the board about the patient’s death and the doctor’s use of the muscle-paralyzing drug.

During the investigation, the committee interviewed health-care professionals, the patient’s family members and medical ethics experts.

In the hours before the patient died, DiCristofaro also gave the patient morphine and other narcotic pain medications to ease pain.

The Board of Medicine does not disclose patients’ names, ages or addresses.

http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200802130764?page=2&build=cache


Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

I have had the honor of having Dr DiCristofaro as my family doctor for ten years, and consider him the best doctor I have ever known. No other doctor would take the time to personally know and understand their patients and their needs. He is the very definition of what a family doctor should be. The fact that the board would even investigate this complaint, much less issue a suspension, is a slap in the face of every patient. Put yourself in the place of that dying patient, or worse, in the place of the wife, and imagine what it would be like to have a doctor too afraid of board action to help aleive this horrible suffering. Shame on you, board members, for even considering this complaint, and shame on you, Mr Michaels, for filing this complaint against the only worthwhile doctor at CAMC Teays Valley. You are really making progress in turning the hospital back into the old Putnam General that earned such a miserable reputation.

Type your comment here.
I had the honor of working with Dr. DiCristofaro as a nurse @ a Teays Valley nursing home and as a result of seeing the compassion and respect that he treated his pts with he alone inspired me to return to school and become a PA. I now have been practicing medicine for 2 years as a result of his influence and would trust him 100% to be my supervising physician anyday. I only hope he reads this blog to see how much I respect his ability to practice medicine and the influence that he had on me. I will keep he and his family in my thoughts and prayers and know that he will return to medicine and to the pts that love and respect him. Best of luck to you Dr. Sean!!

Very astonishing! a person on death bed being killed by a doctor, known to be an expert, on the request of another person, known to be his wife, with a view to ease his death or to ease the difficulty that could not be understand by any one but the patient in the contest of pain and difficulty, so to award a mercy death.
This is, in my opinion, a deliberate act of criminal negligence and malpractice. This is an act of insanity with no justification what so ever .no law under any circumstances, may allow subject crime, but in extreme of conditions, that hazards, threaten and bereaved the life of multiple individual, in extremes of massive disaster and casualties, but again with crucial unjustified justification, that goes through the severe scrutinizing and in depth investigation by audit.
If I stood on the platform of general discussion without and motiveless belonging to cadre, class, caste, or religion, I will still hold the said opinion.
Although the subject demand justification on the motive of the issue, which is masked or in overriding position due to the concept of professionalism, being granted and by virtue of honor being awarded to the man, bearing tag as representative of god, but on the other hand criminal attitude and motive may be one of the factor that can never be omitted from the book of audit and inquiry.
If I scrutinize the issue of death mercy in the light and perception of the west, they seem to be the flag bearer of the right of conscience, prohibiting abortions with full standing aviation. However when it comes to death by mercy the element of conscience is sacrificed.
The dual trend of policy reflects a motive based ,self assign ,desirable choice so to create and design own terms of demarcation and policies as and when necessary ,benefiting in any case the personnel motives.
Although being professional, I do not disagree over its existence in the subject of medical profession, but my horizon and expertise restrict my observation and skill, to initiate and own the issue in ethical manner.
Initiating the decision to hold the breath of individual on the consent of a lay man in the name of next of kin is an emblem of acceptability that skilled, honor and expertise as decision maker has been sacrificed, benefiting each other in the form of easy escape from severe upcoming engagement as professionals.
dear if decision such as positive outcome in repect of survival of the patient can be taken as per consent of attendant ,i wonder that in future american voard would allow CPR as illegal or choice of the doctor or the attendand as sequelea of every trauma unsustainable resides at death,if not attended and rectified with intence cpr.

The person above me (dr razahaider) does not know what they are talking about.