Bioethics, objection of conscience & clinician autonomy


‘Objection of conscience’ was a hot bioethical topic in 2007 and will remain in the spotlight for 2008. Objection of conscience overlaps with the bioethical issue ‘clinician autonomy’, a topic that the nonprofit Bioethics International travels the continent discussing with clinicians, hospitals, medical associations and others.   Do clinicians, pharmacists, patients, and hospitals have the right to object to medical interventions that violate their consciences, such as dispensing emergency contraception or the administration of a life saving blood transfusion?  Status update:

  • Last week, a 14-year-old leukemia patient objected to a life saving blood transfusion dying shortly thereafter
  • All pharmacists must dispense emergency contraception in Washington State.
  • Connecticut passed a similar mandate for all hospitals.
  • New York State unanimously voted that contraceptives must be covered in prescription drug plans for religious and faith-based ministries, with limited exceptions.

What do we do when everybody’s freedom cannot be respected, who retains the right to exercise an objection of conscience- and under what circumstances?   By Jennifer Miller, Bioethics International ©   Further reading: (Seattle Times) Mount Vernon leukemia patient, 14, dies after rejecting transfusions

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Bioethics and economics: In Hospice Care, Longer Lives Mean Money Lost
The Benefits, and Potential Side Effects, of Sharing Medical Records Online

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!