<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does everything have a price tag, including human eggs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioethicsinternational.org/blog/2007/09/13/does-everything-have-a-price-tag-including-human-eggs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioethicsinternational.org/blog/2007/09/13/does-everything-have-a-price-tag-including-human-eggs/</link>
	<description>Because just enough isn&#039;t good enough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:23:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Bello</title>
		<link>http://www.bioethicsinternational.org/blog/2007/09/13/does-everything-have-a-price-tag-including-human-eggs/comment-page-1/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Bello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioethicsinternational.org/?p=257#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>some dialogue on this topic would be intriguing...
the title sounds slightly disparaging?
Ok, it\&#039;s unfortunate that all cannot capitalize on such an offer, but it still helps some women i\&#039;m sure. so why give those who can benefit from this scenario the same burden back again by cancelling it.
As i see it, the trouble is that the NHS can\&#039;t afford to give IVF to everyone who needs it and the most pertinent quetion is
where can we potentially find alternative means to contribute financially to those who, for whatever reason, can\&#039;t benefit from this scenario?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some dialogue on this topic would be intriguing&#8230;<br />
the title sounds slightly disparaging?<br />
Ok, it\&#8217;s unfortunate that all cannot capitalize on such an offer, but it still helps some women i\&#8217;m sure. so why give those who can benefit from this scenario the same burden back again by cancelling it.<br />
As i see it, the trouble is that the NHS can\&#8217;t afford to give IVF to everyone who needs it and the most pertinent quetion is<br />
where can we potentially find alternative means to contribute financially to those who, for whatever reason, can\&#8217;t benefit from this scenario?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

