Does everything have a price tag, including human eggs?


money1.bmpIn Northern England women who ‘donate’ their eggs for therapeutic cloning purposes qualify for half off their in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. The £1500 credit incentive blurs the linguistic and bioethical line between ’donation’ and ‘commodity’.

BBC Article: Women in the north of England are being offered half-price fertility treatment if they donate some of their eggs to medical research. The controversial “egg-sharing” scheme is being run by the Newcastle Fertility Centre and is being funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC).

It offers women £1,500 towards the costs of In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) if they donate half their eggs.

But opponents claim the project would take advantage of vulnerable women.

The MRC is giving the Newcastle University project £150,000.

Public consultation

Priority will be given to couples living in the region between Teesside to the Scottish Borders having treatment at the Newcastle Fertility Centre.

The team at the North East England Stem Cell Institute plan to use them for nuclear re-programming, or therapeutic cloning to make human embryonic stem cells.

Scientists hope research on the cells will revolutionise medicine, helping find new treatments for incurable conditions such as diabetes and Parkinson’s disease.

Under pressure

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority agreed in July last year that the practice could proceed – a decision confirmed in January after a public consultation, and now funding has also been approved.

Head of department at the centre, Professor Alison Murdoch, said: “This will ease the financial burden for women who require IVF.

“There is no additional physical risk to the woman as a result of egg sharing.

“Like all UK research, it will be strictly regulated at a local and national level by ethics committees and the principles of research governance.”

Josephine Quintaville, from the group Comment on Reproductive Ethics, has already claimed the scheme is “lunacy” and that it will put vulnerable, infertile women under pressure.

Clare Brown, of Infertility Network UK, said “We are concerned that in some cases patients are having to consider egg sharing either for treatment or in this case for research in order to access treatment because they cannot access NHS treatment.”  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/6992642.stm 

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
A Medical Publisher’s Unusual Prescription: Online Ads
New rules to decrease gifts to lawmakers are only making matters worse, they say.

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

some dialogue on this topic would be intriguing…
the title sounds slightly disparaging?
Ok, it\’s unfortunate that all cannot capitalize on such an offer, but it still helps some women i\’m sure. so why give those who can benefit from this scenario the same burden back again by cancelling it.
As i see it, the trouble is that the NHS can\’t afford to give IVF to everyone who needs it and the most pertinent quetion is
where can we potentially find alternative means to contribute financially to those who, for whatever reason, can\’t benefit from this scenario?